IRS Clarifies Stance On No Deductibility Of Expenses Paid With PPP Funds




If we’ve learned anything in 2020, it’s to take life one day at a time. That goes double for business owners who participated in the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). The program was supposed to make the lives of business owners easier during the pandemic, but after 11 pages of FAQs and 26 Interim Final Rules, it has just added to their burden. And we’re not done yet. The IRS just released Revenue Ruling 2020-27 and Revenue Procedure 2020-51 to clarify the rules for deducting expenses paid with PPP funds. Here’s what you need to know.


Some background


In May, IRS notice 2020-32 informed us that “no deduction is allowed for an eligible expense that is otherwise deductible if the payment of the eligible expense results in forgiveness of the covered loan.” That meant that a loan that was supposed to be excluded from income was now getting brought back in through the back door. In other words, you get the benefit of the money, but you can’t deduct payments for expenses such as payroll, rent, interest on covered mortgage obligations and any covered utility payments. That effectively increases your net business income.


As this stance stirred up controversy, some legislators proposed new rules that would make the expenses deductible. By simplifying these rules and proposing additional legislation that may forgive loans under $150k, law makers sought to simplify forgiveness for the vast majority of borrowers. (Some 4.5 million of the 5.2 million loans were under $150k.)


But here we are at the end of the year, and the vast majority of borrowers haven’t even applied for forgiveness. A change in government administrations is weeks away, and many small businesses desperately want to get these loans off of their balance sheets.


The latest guidance


Fast forward to yesterday evening when we received both a Revenue Ruling (Rev. Rul.) and a Revenue Procedure (Rev. Proc.). A Rev. Rul. is an official interpretation by the IRS of the Internal Revenue Code, related statutes, tax, treaties and regulations. A Rev. Proc. is an official statement of a procedure that affects the rights or duties of taxpayers or other members of the public. Simply put, a revenue ruling states the IRS’ position and the revenue procedure states instructions on how to implement the IRS’ position. These both differ from a Notice, which is a public pronouncement guiding interpretations of the tax code and other provisions of the law.


MORE FOR YOU : pgslot


Let’s start with the Rev. Rul., which again, is the IRS’s official position on the issue of deductibility. Not much has changed since the May notice. Expenses paid with PPP loan funds are not deductible. However, the big difference is that the Notice said “no deduction is allowed for an eligible expense that is otherwise deductible if the payment of the eligible expense results in forgiveness of the covered loan” (emphasis mine). The phrasing “results in forgiveness” implies that the forgiveness needed to happen before this rule would kick in. That created a lot of angst because most borrowers wouldn’t have applied for forgiveness before the end of the year and thus weren’t sure whether to deduct the expense paid with the loan on their 2020 tax return.


However, the Rev. Rul. states that even if a borrower has “a reasonable expectation of reimbursement” the deduction is inappropriate. In short, even if forgiveness hasn’t happened, borrowers can’t deduct expenses paid for with PPP funds if they reasonably believe the loan will be forgiven.


The Ruling gives two examples. In one, the taxpayer (designated as B) hasn’t applied for forgiveness by the end of 2020 (which will be the case for many of you out there) but has satisfied all of the requirements under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) and expects to apply for forgiveness in 2021. The rule states “at the end of 2020 B both knew the amount of eligible expenses that qualified for reimbursement in the form of covered loan forgiveness and has a reasonable expectation of reimbursement.” Because that reimbursement of the loan was “foreseeable,” B may not deduct her eligible expenses.